Expand a short statement with useful explanation. Add the details you already know instead of making a sentence longer with empty words.
How to use
Sign in and paste the sentence. Add reasons, examples, or constraints in context and choose a length. Remove any new claim that lacks support.
Example
Expand “The workshop moved online” with the supplied reason, date, and access instructions rather than inventing attendance figures.
FAQ
How much expansion is useful?
Stop when the reader has enough context to act. Keep names, quantities, and conditions from your source unchanged.
Related tools
A practical task
Supply the missing substance rather than only requesting more words. For “The service changed,” add what changed, when, whom it affects, and what the reader must do. Expansion should answer those questions without drifting into unrelated background.
Another useful question
Can expansion add unsupported reasons?
A draft can introduce them, so review carefully. Give the verified reason yourself and remove explanations that are absent from your facts.
Details for interpreting the result
| Detail | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Source boundaries | A summary or rewrite works from the material you provide. A URL alone does not supply the full article in this interface. Include the relevant passage and keep citations attached to the claims they support. |
| Tone and commitments | Tone changes the way a message sounds, not the obligations it contains. A friendly version must not invent permission, and a formal version must not invent a promise. Compare commitments as well as style. |
| Supplied facts | A writing request needs the facts the finished draft must preserve. Names, dates, quantities, and policies should come from your source. Missing information is a question to resolve rather than a blank to fill with a plausible invention. |
| Editorial review | Review facts, names, omissions, and implications before approving a draft. A smooth sentence can still change a condition or attribute a statement to the wrong person. Compare meaning with the source instead of judging fluency alone. |
| Context and audience | The same fact needs different explanation for a specialist and a first time reader. State the audience, purpose, and terms they already know. Relevant context guides wording more effectively than broad requests to make a text impressive. |
| Words and meaning | Sharing words does not prove that two passages make the same claim. Negation, order, context, and different subjects can change meaning while vocabulary stays similar. Read the passages before making an editorial judgment. |
| Attribution | Changing wording does not change the origin of an idea or factual finding. Preserve required citations and distinguish your analysis from borrowed material. A paraphrase is not proof of independent research. |